Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-38772
Title: Reliability analysis of successive Corvis ST® measurements in keratoconus 2 years after accelerated corneal crosslinking compared to untreated keratoconus corneas
Author(s): Xanthopoulou, Kassandra
Seitz, Berthold
Belin, Michael W.
Flockerzi, Elias
Language: English
Title: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Publisher/Platform: Springer Nature
Year of Publication: 2022
Free key words: Corneal biomechanics
Corvis
Keratoconus
Corneal crosslinking
Biomechanical E-staging
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Purpose To assess the reliability of successive Corvis ST® measurements (CST, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) in keratoconus (KC)≥2 years after accelerated corneal crosslinking (9 mW/cm2 , 10 min, 5.4 J/cm2 ) compared to untreated KC corneas. Methods Three successive CST measurements per eye were performed in≥2 years after CXL (CXLG, n=20 corneas of 16 patients) and a control group consisting of non-operated, ABC-stage-matched KC corneas according to Belin’s ABCD KC grading (controls, n=20 corneas, 20 patients). Main outcome measures included maximal keratometry (Kmax), the Belin/ Ambrósio-Enhanced-Ectasia-Deviation-Index BAD-D; the biomechanical parameters A1 velocity, deformation amplitude (DA) ratio 2 mm, Ambrósio relational thickness to the horizontal profle (ARTh), integrated radius, stifness parameter A1 (SP-A1), and the Corvis Biomechanical Factor (CBiF, the linearized term of the Corvis Biomechanical Index). Mean values, standard deviations, and Cronbach’s alpha (CA) were calculated. Results Both groups were tomographically comparable (BAD: 11.5±4.7|11.2±3.6, p=0.682, Kmax: 60.5±7.2|60.7±7.7, p=0.868 for controls|CXLG, paired t-test). A1 velocity (mean±SD: 0.176±0.02|0.183±0.02, p=0.090, CA: 0.960|0.960), DA ratio 2 mm (6.04±1.13|6.14±1.03, p=0.490, CA: 0.967|0.967), integrated radius (12.08±2.5|12.42±1.9, p=0.450, CA: 0.976|0.976), and CBiF (4.62±0.6|4.62±0.4, p=0.830, CA: 0.965|0.965) were also comparable (controls|CXLG). ARTh was signifcantly higher in controls (177.1±59, CA: 0.993) than after CXL (155.21±65, p=0.0062, CA: 0.993) and SP-A1 was signifcantly higher after CXL (59.2±13, CA: 0.912) than in controls (52.2±16, p=0.0018, CA: 0.912). Conclusion ARTh and SP-A1 difered signifcantly between controls and CXLG. Biomechanical measurements were generally of excellent reliability in both groups. CXL seems to afect biomechanical measurements of human corneas over more than 2 years.
DOI of the first publication: 10.1007/s00417-022-05881-6
URL of the first publication: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00417-022-05881-6
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-387725
hdl:20.500.11880/34938
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-38772
ISSN: 1435-702X
0721-832X
Date of registration: 20-Jan-2023
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Augenheilkunde
Professorship: M - Prof. Dr. Berthold Seitz
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
s00417-022-05881-6.pdf734,62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons