Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen:
doi:10.22028/D291-38772
Titel: | Reliability analysis of successive Corvis ST® measurements in keratoconus 2 years after accelerated corneal crosslinking compared to untreated keratoconus corneas |
VerfasserIn: | Xanthopoulou, Kassandra Seitz, Berthold Belin, Michael W. Flockerzi, Elias |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Titel: | Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology |
Verlag/Plattform: | Springer Nature |
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2022 |
Freie Schlagwörter: | Corneal biomechanics Corvis Keratoconus Corneal crosslinking Biomechanical E-staging |
DDC-Sachgruppe: | 610 Medizin, Gesundheit |
Dokumenttyp: | Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel |
Abstract: | Purpose To assess the reliability of successive Corvis ST® measurements (CST, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) in keratoconus (KC)≥2 years after accelerated corneal crosslinking (9 mW/cm2 , 10 min, 5.4 J/cm2 ) compared to untreated KC corneas. Methods Three successive CST measurements per eye were performed in≥2 years after CXL (CXLG, n=20 corneas of 16 patients) and a control group consisting of non-operated, ABC-stage-matched KC corneas according to Belin’s ABCD KC grading (controls, n=20 corneas, 20 patients). Main outcome measures included maximal keratometry (Kmax), the Belin/ Ambrósio-Enhanced-Ectasia-Deviation-Index BAD-D; the biomechanical parameters A1 velocity, deformation amplitude (DA) ratio 2 mm, Ambrósio relational thickness to the horizontal profle (ARTh), integrated radius, stifness parameter A1 (SP-A1), and the Corvis Biomechanical Factor (CBiF, the linearized term of the Corvis Biomechanical Index). Mean values, standard deviations, and Cronbach’s alpha (CA) were calculated. Results Both groups were tomographically comparable (BAD: 11.5±4.7|11.2±3.6, p=0.682, Kmax: 60.5±7.2|60.7±7.7, p=0.868 for controls|CXLG, paired t-test). A1 velocity (mean±SD: 0.176±0.02|0.183±0.02, p=0.090, CA: 0.960|0.960), DA ratio 2 mm (6.04±1.13|6.14±1.03, p=0.490, CA: 0.967|0.967), integrated radius (12.08±2.5|12.42±1.9, p=0.450, CA: 0.976|0.976), and CBiF (4.62±0.6|4.62±0.4, p=0.830, CA: 0.965|0.965) were also comparable (controls|CXLG). ARTh was signifcantly higher in controls (177.1±59, CA: 0.993) than after CXL (155.21±65, p=0.0062, CA: 0.993) and SP-A1 was signifcantly higher after CXL (59.2±13, CA: 0.912) than in controls (52.2±16, p=0.0018, CA: 0.912). Conclusion ARTh and SP-A1 difered signifcantly between controls and CXLG. Biomechanical measurements were generally of excellent reliability in both groups. CXL seems to afect biomechanical measurements of human corneas over more than 2 years. |
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: | 10.1007/s00417-022-05881-6 |
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00417-022-05881-6 |
Link zu diesem Datensatz: | urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-387725 hdl:20.500.11880/34938 http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-38772 |
ISSN: | 1435-702X 0721-832X |
Datum des Eintrags: | 20-Jan-2023 |
Fakultät: | M - Medizinische Fakultät |
Fachrichtung: | M - Augenheilkunde |
Professur: | M - Prof. Dr. Berthold Seitz |
Sammlung: | SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes |
Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
s00417-022-05881-6.pdf | 734,62 kB | Adobe PDF | Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons