Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
doi:10.22028/D291-46384
Title: | Support on four paws-does the integration of a therapy dog reduce anxiety and increase positive affect in spider phobics during in vivo exposure therapy?: study protocol for a parallel randomised controlled trial of two groups to compare one-session in vivo exposure treatment of spider phobia with and without a therapy dog |
Author(s): | Braun, Moritz Nicolai Michael, Tanja Equit, Monika Lass-Hennemann, Johanna |
Language: | English |
Title: | BMJ Open |
Volume: | 15 |
Issue: | 7 |
Publisher/Platform: | BMJ |
Year of Publication: | 2025 |
DDC notations: | 150 Psychology |
Publikation type: | Journal Article |
Abstract: | Introduction Exposure is a central component in the treatment of a range of mental disorders. However, despite high efficacy and efficiency, dissemination of exposure based treatments is limited. Important factors that contribute to this limited dissemination are negative beliefs about exposure on the part of the public, the therapists, and the patients. While patients perceive exposure therapy as burdensome, therapists are concerned about putting too much strain on their patients during exposure, leading to suboptimal delivery of exposure. In a previous study, in which healthy participants underwent a differential fear conditioning paradigm, we found initial evidence that the integration of a therapy dog into exposure reduces participants’ anxiety and increases participants’ positive affect without causing poor treatment outcome. Thus, the integration of a therapy dog into exposure might be a promising approach to address patients’ and therapists’ concerns and, thus, to (1) foster dissemination of exposure that is (2) delivered in an optimal manner. To scrutinise our findings in a clinical sample, we designed the present study. We test the following hypotheses: (H1) participants in the dog group report significantly less anxiety during the course of the treatment than participants in the control group. (H2) Participants in the dog group report significantly more positive affect during the course of the treatment than participants in the control group. (H3) Participants in the dog group report significantly higher therapy motivation than participants in the control group. (H4) Participants in the dog group report significantly lower anticipatory anxiety than participants in the control group. (H5) The treatment in the dog group is not inferior to the treatment in the control group. |
DOI of the first publication: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101648 |
URL of the first publication: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/7/e101648 |
Link to this record: | urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-463845 hdl:20.500.11880/40658 http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-46384 |
ISSN: | 2044-6055 |
Date of registration: | 7-Oct-2025 |
Description of the related object: | Supplemental material |
Related object: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/15/7/e101648/DC1/embed/inline-supplementary-material-1.pdf?download=true |
Faculty: | HW - Fakultät für Empirische Humanwissenschaften und Wirtschaftswissenschaft |
Department: | HW - Psychologie |
Professorship: | HW - Prof. Dr. Tanja Michael |
Collections: | SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes |
Files for this record:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
e101648.full.pdf | 1,52 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License