Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen:
doi:10.22028/D291-44932
Titel: | CMV management of patients with leukopenia after CMV high-risk kidney transplantation |
VerfasserIn: | Abu-Omar, Amina Mihm, Janine Bronder, Saskia Schmidt, Tina Sester, Martina Sester, Urban |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Titel: | Transplant Immunology |
Bandnummer: | 89 |
Verlag/Plattform: | Elsevier |
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2025 |
Freie Schlagwörter: | Cytomegalovirus Valganciclovir Leukopenia CMV immunoglobulins T cells |
DDC-Sachgruppe: | 610 Medizin, Gesundheit |
Dokumenttyp: | Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel |
Abstract: | Background: For CMV high-risk constellations, guidelines recommend 3–6 months of prophylaxis with valganciclovir (VGCV). Management in preventing CMV primary infection in patients developing VGCV-associated leukopenia remains challenging. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the development of leukopenia during VGCV prophylaxis in 57 seronegative kidney recipients of a CMV-seropositive donor between 2008 and 2021. We analyzed CMV risk and development of CMV-specific T cells in the first post-transplant year depending on leukopenia during VGCV prophylaxis and management with CMV-IVIg. Results: Leukopenia developed in 19/57 patients, with a significant difference in leukocyte counts occurring after 10 weeks of VGCV prophylaxis compared to patients without leukopenia (p = 0.0003). VGCV discontinuation led to leukocyte reconstitution, which tended to be faster in patients receiving additional prophylaxis with CMV-IVIg after VGCV discontinuation (n = 11, p = 0.083). In the first post-transplant year, patients with leukopenia had no higher risk for severe CMV events. Interestingly, patients receiving CMV-IVIg prophylaxis showed a significantly lower peak CMV-load during primary infection (p = 0.040), with no difference in CMV-specific T-cell levels compared to patients without leukopenia or patients with additional CMV-IVIg prophylaxis (p = 0.972). Patients developing adequate CMV-specific T-cell responses less frequently underwent CMV reactivation 50 days following primary infection. Conclusion: Leukopenia developed late during VGCV prophylaxis and did not result in an increased risk for CMV primary infections or severe disease. Leukopenic patients receiving CMV-IVIg tended to have a faster leukocyte reconstitution and had lower peak DNAemia, which did not adversely affect CMV-specific T-cell induction. CMVIVIg may therefore be considered as an alternative prophylactic strategy in patients with VGCV-associated leukopenia. |
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: | 10.1016/j.trim.2025.102188 |
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trim.2025.102188 |
Link zu diesem Datensatz: | urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-449321 hdl:20.500.11880/39889 http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-44932 |
ISSN: | 0966-3274 |
Datum des Eintrags: | 2-Apr-2025 |
Bezeichnung des in Beziehung stehenden Objekts: | Supplementary data |
In Beziehung stehendes Objekt: | https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0966327425000164-mmc1.docx |
Fakultät: | M - Medizinische Fakultät |
Fachrichtung: | M - Infektionsmedizin M - Innere Medizin |
Professur: | M - Prof. Dr. Martina Sester M - Keiner Professur zugeordnet |
Sammlung: | SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes |
Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0966327425000164-main.pdf | 2,12 MB | Adobe PDF | Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons