Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-42532
Title: Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Test of Passive Aggression in a Psychotherapy Outpatient Sample
Author(s): Schanz, Christian Günter
Equit, Monika
Schäfer, Sarah K.
Michael, Tanja
Language: English
Title: Frontiers in Psychology
Volume: 12
Publisher/Platform: Frontiers
Year of Publication: 2021
Free key words: self-directed aggression
passive aggression
test development
self-harm
aggressive behavior
DDC notations: 150 Psychology
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Background: While most clinical aggression questionnaires focus on the assessment of active aggression, the recently developed Test of Passive Aggression (TPA) assesses both self-directed (TPA-SD) and other-directed passive aggression (TPA-OD). Reliability and factorial validity of the TPA have been demonstrated in a clinical sample, while previous evaluations of convergent and discriminant validity were limited to student samples. The current study aimed at addressing this gap by demonstrating convergent and discriminant validity of the TPA in an outpatient sample. Methods: Eighty-two patients admitted to an outpatient psychotherapy unit at Saarland University, Germany, participated in the preregistered study with an assessment of selfreported passive aggression, impulsivity, anger expression, self-compassion, self-esteem, and auto-aggressive mindset. Analyses used regression models with robust maximum likelihood estimations. Results: Self-directed passive aggression showed a significant association with selfcompassion, auto-aggressive mindset, self-esteem, and internal anger expression supporting the convergent validity of TPA-SD. Results on discriminant validity of TPA-SD were heterogenous at the first sight, revealing small associations of self-directed passive aggression with anger control but medium associations with impulsivity. However, exploratory analysis showed that the medium association with impulsivity was driven by the non-behavioral impulsivity dimension “inattention” and that both behavioral impulsivity dimensions (“motor-impulsivity” and “unplanned behavior”) demonstrated only weak associations with TPA-SD. Validity of TPA-OD was not supported by the current study. Conclusion: Our findings provide evidence for the validity of the TPA-SD to outpatient samples. Future studies will need to analyze construct validity based on a nomological network using larger and more diverse samples.
DOI of the first publication: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723413
URL of the first publication: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723413
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-425323
hdl:20.500.11880/38162
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-42532
ISSN: 1664-1078
Date of registration: 2-Aug-2024
Faculty: HW - Fakultät für Empirische Humanwissenschaften und Wirtschaftswissenschaft
Department: HW - Psychologie
Professorship: HW - Prof. Dr. Tanja Michael
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
fpsyg-12-723413.pdf259,05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons