Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
doi:10.22028/D291-40766
Title: | Hazard Perception, Presence, and Simulation Sickness—A Comparison of Desktop and Head-Mounted Display for Driving Simulation |
Author(s): | Malone, Sarah Brünken, Roland |
Language: | English |
Title: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Volume: | 12 |
Publisher/Platform: | Frontiers |
Year of Publication: | 2021 |
Free key words: | virtual reality head-mounted display driving experience presence simulation sickness hazard perception assessment |
DDC notations: | 370 Education |
Publikation type: | Journal Article |
Abstract: | Driving simulators are becoming increasingly common in driver training and assessment. Since virtual reality is generally regarded as an appropriate environment for measuring risk behavior, simulators are also used to assess hazard perception, which is considered to be one of the most important skills for safe driving. Simulators, which offer challenges that are indeed comparable to driving in real traffic, but at a very low risk of physical injury, have the potential to complement theoretical and practical driver trainings and tests. Although configurations and fidelity differ considerably between driving simulators, studies comparing the impact of their distinct features on driving performance and test validity remain rare. In this context, prior research demonstrated that a wider field of view (three monitors compared to a single monitor) led to earlier speed adjustments in response to potential hazards—especially for experienced drivers. The wider field of view was assumed to cause the drivers to be more present in the virtual world, which in turn provoked more natural scanning of the road and therefore, earlier hazard detection in experienced drivers. Research on spatial presence in other contexts support this assumption. The present experiment investigated whether this effect could be enhanced by an even more immersive presentation technique for driving simulation: a head-mounted display (HMD). Moreover, we studied the interplay between display mode, sense of presence and simulation sickness. Eighty experienced and less experienced drivers completed six simulation-based hazard perception scenarios, which were displayed either via a triple-monitor set-up or an HMD. Results indicate that the experienced drivers showed very similar driving and risk behavior as the inexperienced drivers in both experimental conditions. However, there were significant differences between the two display conditions. The use of an HMD resulted in a clearer and more abrupt speed reduction, more virtual presence, and a higher degree of simulation sickness. However, the interrelation between these three variables could not be conclusively clarified in the present study and thus represents a research aim that could be addressed in future studies. |
DOI of the first publication: | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647723 |
URL of the first publication: | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647723 |
Link to this record: | urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-407667 hdl:20.500.11880/36637 http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-40766 |
ISSN: | 1664-1078 |
Date of registration: | 20-Oct-2023 |
Faculty: | HW - Fakultät für Empirische Humanwissenschaften und Wirtschaftswissenschaft |
Department: | HW - Bildungswissenschaften |
Professorship: | HW - Prof. Dr. Roland Brünken |
Collections: | SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes |
Files for this record:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
fpsyg-12-647723.pdf | 2,34 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License