Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-40484
Title: Assessment of Inadequate Use of Pediatric Emergency Medical Transport Services: The Pediatric Emergency and Ambulance Critical Evaluation (PEACE) Study
Author(s): Poryo, Martin
Burger, Martin
Wagenpfeil, Stefan
Ziegler, Bennet
Sauer, Harald
Flotats-Bastardas, Marina
Grundmann, Ulrich
Zemlin, Michael
Meyer, Sascha
Language: English
Title: Frontiers in pediatrics
Volume: 7
Publisher/Platform: Frontiers
Year of Publication: 2019
Free key words: ambulance
emergency medical transport service
misuse
pediatric emergency
public health
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Aim: To provide data on the inadequate use of emergency medical transports services (EMTS) in children and underlying contributing factors. Methods: This was a prospective single-center cohort study (01/2017-12/2017) performed at the Saarland University Children's Hospital, Homburg, Germany. Patients ≤20 years of age transported by EMTS for suspected acute illness/trauma were included and proportion of inadequate/adequate EMTS use, underlying contributing factors, and additional costs were analyzed. Results: Three hundred seventy-nine patients (mean age: 9.0 ± 6.3 years; 55.7% male, 44.3% female) were included in this study. The three most common reasons for EMTS use were: central nervous system (30.6%), respiratory system affection (14.0%), and traumas (13.2%). ETMS use was categorized as inadequate depending on physician's experience: senior physician (58.8%), pediatrician (54.9%), resident (52.7%). All three physicians considered 127 (33.5%) cases to be medically indicated for transportation by EMTS, and 177 (46.7%) to be medically not indicated. The following parameters were significantly associated with inadequate EMTS use: non-acute onset of symptoms (OR 2.5), parental perception as non-life-threatening (OR 1.7), and subsequent out-patient treatment (OR 4.0). Conversely, transport by an emergency physician (OR 3.5) and first time parental EMTS call (OR 1.7) were associated with adequate use of EMTS. Moreover, a significant relation existed between maternal, respectively, paternal educational status and inadequate EMTS use (each p = 0.01). Using multiple logistic regression analysis, non-acute onset of symptoms (OR 2.2) was associated with inadequate use of EMTS while first time parental EMTS call (OR 1.8), transport by an emergency physician (OR 3.3), and need for in-patient treatment (OR 4.0) were associated with adequate use of EMTS. Conclusion: A substantial number of pediatric EMTS is medically not indicated. Possibly, specific measures including multifaceted educational efforts may be helpful in reducing unnecessary EMTS use.
DOI of the first publication: 10.3389/fped.2019.00442
URL of the first publication: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2019.00442
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-404849
hdl:20.500.11880/36379
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-40484
ISSN: 2296-2360
Date of registration: 4-Sep-2023
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und medizinische Informatik
M - Pädiatrie
Professorship: M - Prof. Dr. Stefan Wagenpfeil
M - Prof. Dr. Michael Zemlin
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
fped-07-00442.pdf568,89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons