Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-37749
Volltext verfügbar? / Dokumentlieferung
Title: Robotic Assisted Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Small Volume Metastatic Testicular Cancer
Author(s): Hiester, Andreas
Nini, Alessandro
Arsov, Christian
Buddensieck, Carolin
Albers, Peter
Language: English
Title: The Journal of Urology
Volume: 204
Issue: 6
Pages: 1242-1248
Publisher/Platform: American Urological Association
Year of Publication: 2020
Free key words: robotic surgical procedures
neoplasms
germ cell and embryonic
lymph node excision
retroperitoneal space
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Purpose: Robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with testicular cancer is controversial. Lately, unusual recurrence patterns with adverse outcomes after robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection have been published. In this report we determine the feasibility, safety and early oncologic outcome of robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with small volume metastatic testicular cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 27 consecutive patients with small volume metastatic testicular cancer (October 2010 to November 2019) who underwent robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (unilateral modified template). Intraoperative and postoperative complications as well as early oncologic outcomes are reported. Surgery was performed in the primary metastatic setting in 22 (81%), post-chemotherapy in 4 (15%) and for late relapse in 1 patient (4%). Initial clinical stage was IIA for 14 (52%), IIB for 12 (43%) and III for 1 (4%) patient. Results: Median operative time, blood loss and length of hospital stay were 175 minutes, 50 ml and 4 days, respectively. Expectedly, viable tumor was found in 21/27 patients (78%) and 6 patients (22%) showed fibrosis, necrosis or no tumor. Overall 3 (11%) patients experienced intraoperative (Satava II) and 1 (4%) postoperative (Clavien-Dindo IIIb) complications, respectively. Median followup was 16.5 months (3-69), and 3 (11%) patients experienced relapse outside of the surgical field after 12, 22 and 36 months. Conclusions: In highly selected patients with low volume metastatic testicular cancer robotic assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection may be indicated, and appears to be technically feasible and comparable with open surgery in terms of complications and early oncologic safety. Prospective data collection in larger series is necessary to clarify the role and specific indications of this approach.
DOI of the first publication: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001301
URL of the first publication: https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001301
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-377496
hdl:20.500.11880/34136
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-37749
ISSN: 1527-3792
0022-5347
Date of registration: 27-Oct-2022
Description of the related object: Supplementary Materials
Related object: https://www.auajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1097/JU.0000000000001301/suppl_file/Supplementary_table1.pdf
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1097/JU.0000000000001301/suppl_file/Supplementary_appendix1.pdf
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Urologie und Kinderurologie
Professorship: M - Prof. Dr. Michael Stöckle
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SciDok are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.