Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-37701
Volltext verfügbar? / Dokumentlieferung
Title: The prognostic impact of Claudin 6 in papillary renal cell carcinoma
Author(s): Mikuteit, Marie
Zschäbitz, Stefanie
Stöhr, Christine
Herrmann, Edwin
Polifka, Iris
Agaimy, Abbas
Trojan, Lutz
Ströbel, Philipp
Becker, Frank
Wülfing, Christian
Barth, Peter
Stöckle, Michael
Staehler, Michael
Stief, Christian
Haferkamp, Axel
Hohenfellner, Markus
Macher-Göppinger, Stephan
Wullich, Bernd
Noldus, Joachim
Brenner, Walburgis
Roos, Frederik C.
Walter, Bernhard
Otto, Wolfgang
Burger, Maximilian
Schrader, Andres Jan
Hartmann, Arndt
Steffens, Sandra
Erlmeier, Franziska
Language: English
Title: Pathology - Research and Practice
Volume: 231
Publisher/Platform: Elsevier
Year of Publication: 2022
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Background Claudins are promising biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis or targets for treatment. They play a major role in signal transduction and are important in nearly all aspects of tumorigenesis. Claudin 6 is a member of the claudin family and is part of the tight junction molecule. It is reactivated in several cancer types and serves as prognostic marker in, for example, gastric, breast or non small cell lung cancer. The prognostic role of Claudin 6 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), especially in papillary RCC (pRCC), is still unclear. Patients and Methods The patients’ sample collection was a joint collaboration of the PANZAR consortium. Patients’ medical history and tumor specimens were collected from n = 240 and n = 128 patients with type 1 and 2 pRCC, respectively. Expression of Claudin 6 was determined by immunohistochemistry. Results In total, Claudin 6 staining was positive in 55 of 240 type 1 and 30 of 128 type 2 pRCC cases. Kaplan-Meier analysis disclosed an overall survival of 84% for Claudin 6- compared to 78% for Claudin 6 + in pRCC type 1 tumors (p = 0.449, log-rank) and 68% for Claudin 6- compared to 65.4% for Claudin 6 + in pRCC type 2 tumors (p = 0.364, log-rank). Conclusion In this study, claudin 6 expression showed no significant association regarding overall survival (OS) and therefore did not qualify as a prognostic marker in pRCC. Future studies will have to determine, whether Claudin 6 plays a prognostic role in other RCC entities. In addition, the function of Claudin 6 as a predictive marker for therapeutic approaches has to be evaluated in future studies.
DOI of the first publication: 10.1016/j.prp.2022.153802
URL of the first publication: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0344033822000450
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-377018
hdl:20.500.11880/34104
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-37701
ISSN: 0344-0338
Date of registration: 25-Oct-2022
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Urologie und Kinderurologie
Professorship: M - Prof. Dr. Michael Stöckle
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SciDok are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.