Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-37696
Volltext verfügbar? / Dokumentlieferung
Title: cMET : a prognostic marker in papillary renal cell carcinoma?
Author(s): Erlmeier, Franziska
Bruecher, Benedict
Stöhr, Christine
Herrmann, Edwin
Polifka, Iris
Agaimy, Abbas
Trojan, Lutz
Ströbel, Philipp
Becker, Frank
Wülfing, Christian
Barth, Peter
Stöckle, Michael
Staehler, Michael
Stief, Christian
Haferkamp, Axel
Hohenfellner, Markus
Macher-Göppinger, Stephan
Wullich, Bernd
Noldus, Joachim
Brenner, Walburgis
Roos, Frederik C.
Walter, Bernhard
Otto, Wolfgang
Burger, Maximilian
Schrader, Andres Jan
Hartmann, Arndt
Mondorf, Yvonne
Ivanyi, Philipp
Mikuteit, Marie
Steffens, Sandra
Language: English
Title: Human Pathology
Volume: 121
Pages: 1-10
Publisher/Platform: Elsevier
Year of Publication: 2022
Free key words: cMET
Papillary renal cell carcinoma
Prognosis
Survival
Outcome
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: The tyrosine-protein kinase c-Met plays a decisive role in numerous cellular processes, as a proto-oncogene that supports aggressive tumor behavior. It is still unknown whether c-Met could be relevant for prognosis of papillary RCC (pRCC). Specimen collection was a collaboration of the PANZAR consortium. Patients' medical history and tumor specimens were collected from 197 and 110 patients with type 1 and 2 pRCC, respectively. Expression of cMET was determined by immunohistochemistry. In total, cMET staining was evaluable in of 97 of 197 type 1 and 63 of 110 type 2 pRCC cases. Five-year overall survival revealed no significant difference in dependence of cMET positivity (cMET− vs. cMET+: pRCC type 1: 84.8% vs. 80.3%, respectively [p = 0.303, log-rank]; type 2: 71.4% vs. 64.4%, respectively [p = 0.239, log-rank]). Interestingly, the subgroup analyses showed a significant difference for cMET expression in T stage and metastases of the pRCC type 2 (p = 0.014, p = 0.022, chi-square). The cMET-positive type 2 collective developed more metastases than the cMET-negative cohort (pRCC type 2 M+: cMET−: 2 [4.3%] vs. cMET+: 12 [19%]). cMET expression did not qualify as a prognostic marker in pRCC for overall survival.
DOI of the first publication: 10.1016/j.humpath.2021.12.007
URL of the first publication: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S004681772100215X
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-376967
hdl:20.500.11880/34101
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-37696
ISSN: 0046-8177
Date of registration: 25-Oct-2022
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Urologie und Kinderurologie
Professorship: M - Prof. Dr. Michael Stöckle
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in SciDok are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.