Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-37553
Title: Minimal-invasive anterior approach to the hip provides a better surgery-related and early postoperative functional outcome than conventional lateral approach after hip hemiarthroplasty following femoral neck fractures
Author(s): Orth, M.
Osche, D.
Mörsdorf, P.
Holstein, J. H.
Rollmann, M. F.
Fritz, T.
Pohlemann, T.
Pizanis, A.
Language: English
Title: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Publisher/Platform: Springer Nature
Year of Publication: 2022
Free key words: Hip
Femoral neck fracture
Hemiarthroplasty
AMIS
Lateral approach
DDC notations: 610 Medicine and health
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: Introduction Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are one of the most frequent fractures among elderly patients and commonly require surgical treatment. Bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty (BHHA) is mostly performed in these cases. Material and methods In the present retrospective study geriatric patients with FNF (n=100) treated either by anterior minimal-invasive surgery (AMIS; n=50) or lateral conventional surgery (LCS; n=50) were characterized (age at the time of surgery, sex, health status/ASA score, walking distance and need for walking aids before the injury) and intraoperative parameters (duration of surgery, blood loss, complications), as well as postoperative functional performance early (duration of in-patient stay, radiological leg length discrepancy, ability to full weight-bearing, mobilization with walking aids) and 12 months (radiological signs of sintering, clinical parameters, complication rate) after surgery were analyzed. Results Patients in the AMIS group demonstrated a reduced blood loss intraoperatively, while the duration of surgery and complication rates did not difer between the two groups. Further, more patients in the AMIS group achieved full weightbearing of the injured leg and were able to walk with a rollator or less support during their in-patient stay. Of interest, patients in the AMIS group achieved this level of mobility earlier than those of the LCS group, although their walking distance before the acute injury was reduced. Moreover, patients of the AMIS group showed equal leg lengths postoperatively more often than patients of the LCS group. No signifcant diferences in functional and surgery-related performance could be observed between AMIS and LCS group at 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions In conclusion, geriatric patients treated by AMIS experience less surgery-related strain and recover faster in the early postoperative phase compared to LCS after displaced FNF. Hence, AMIS should be recommended for BHHA in these vulnerable patients.
DOI of the first publication: 10.1007/s00402-022-04602-2
URL of the first publication: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-022-04602-2
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-375530
hdl:20.500.11880/33975
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-37553
ISSN: 1434-3916
Date of registration: 12-Oct-2022
Faculty: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Department: M - Chirurgie
Professorship: M - Prof. Dr. Tim Pohlemann
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
s00402-022-04602-2.pdf978,28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons