Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen: doi:10.22028/D291-36471
Volltext verfügbar? / Dokumentlieferung
Titel: High heterogeneity on the accepted vaccines for COVID-19 certificates in European countries
VerfasserIn: Dal-Ré, Rafael
Banzi, Rita
Becker, Sören L.
Launay, Odile
Pavli, Androula
Sprache: Englisch
Titel: Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Bandnummer: 48
Verlag/Plattform: Elsevier
Erscheinungsjahr: 2022
Freie Schlagwörter: COVID-19
Passports
Certificates
Europe
Vaccination
Travel
DDC-Sachgruppe: 610 Medizin, Gesundheit
Dokumenttyp: Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel
Abstract: Background: We aimed to elucidate which vaccines were accepted by European countries as valid proof of vaccination against COVID-19 for international travelers. Method: On 27-September-2021 a cross-sectional study was conducted on VisaGuide.World, that reports on valid vaccines for international travelers. Other databases, lay press and regulatory agencies were also checked. The main outcome measure was which of the vaccines included on the WHO emergency use listing (EUL) [ChAdOx1 (Vaxzevria, Covishield),BNT162b2,mRNA-1273,Ad26.CoV2.S,BBIBP-CorV,CoronaVac] and Sputnik V, were accepted in each country. The influence of the vaccines approved for COVID-19 vaccination programs on the vaccines recognized as proof of vaccination was assessed. Results: There was a remarkable heterogeneity on the vaccines accepted as proof of vaccination among 46 countries. Russia accepted only one. Cyprus, Greece and Slovenia accepted all vaccines considered. Eleven countries accepted the seven WHO EUL vaccines: eight EU countries, plus Iceland, Norway and Switzerland. Seven EU countries accepted only the four EMA-authorized vaccines. Considering Covishield as equivalent to Vaxzevria, 69% of countries recognized only vaccinated travelers who received any of the vaccines approved for vaccination programs in the country of arrival as valid. Conclusion: Vaccines accepted as proof of vaccination should be harmonized. Accepting any of the WHO EUL vaccines would be a scientifically sound objective.
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102321
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477893922000679?via%3Dihub
Link zu diesem Datensatz: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-364712
hdl:20.500.11880/33114
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-36471
ISSN: 1477-8939
Datum des Eintrags: 15-Jun-2022
Bezeichnung des in Beziehung stehenden Objekts: Supplementary data
In Beziehung stehendes Objekt: https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S1477893922000679-mmc1.pdf
Fakultät: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Fachrichtung: M - Infektionsmedizin
Professur: M - Prof. Dr. Sören Becker
Sammlung:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Es gibt keine Dateien zu dieser Ressource.


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.