Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: doi:10.22028/D291-33938
Title: Winning coalitions in plurality voting democracies
Author(s): van den Brink, René
Dimitrov, Dinko
Rusinowska, Agnieszka
Language: English
Title: Social Choice and Welfare
Volume: 56
Issue: 3
Pages: 509–530
Publisher/Platform: Springer Nature
Year of Publication: 2020
DDC notations: 330 Economics
Publikation type: Journal Article
Abstract: We consider plurality voting games being simple games in partition function form such that in every partition there is at least one winning coalition. Such a game is said to be weighted if it is possible to assign weights to the players in such a way that a winning coalition in a partition is always one for which the sum of the weights of its members is maximal over all coalitions in the partition. A plurality game is called decisive if in every partition there is exactly one winning coalition. We show that in general, plurality games need not be weighted, even not when they are decisive. After that, we prove that (i) decisive plurality games with at most four players, (ii) majority games with an arbitrary number of players, and (iii) decisive plurality games that exhibit some kind of symmetry, are weighted. Complete characterizations of the winning coalitions in the corresponding partitions are provided as well.
DOI of the first publication: 10.1007/s00355-020-01290-y
Link to this record: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-339386
hdl:20.500.11880/31233
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-33938
ISSN: 1432-217X
0176-1714
Date of registration: 26-Apr-2021
Faculty: HW - Fakultät für Empirische Humanwissenschaften und Wirtschaftswissenschaft
Department: HW - Wirtschaftswissenschaft
Professorship: HW - Prof. Dr. Dinko Dimitrov
Collections:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Files for this record:
File Description SizeFormat 
Brink2021_Article_WinningCoalitionsInPluralityVo.pdf3,34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons