Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen: doi:10.22028/D291-43901
Titel: Literature review, surgical decision making algorithm, and AGREE II-S comparison of national and international recommendations and guidelines in pelvic organ prolapse surgery
VerfasserIn: Pecorella, Giovanni
Morciano, Andrea
Sparic, Radmila
Tinelli, Andrea
Sprache: Englisch
Titel: International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Bandnummer: 167
Heft: 2
Seiten: 560-572
Verlag/Plattform: Wiley
Erscheinungsjahr: 2024
Freie Schlagwörter: laparoscopic surgery
mesh
pelvic organ prolapses
rectocele
sacropexy
vaginal hysterectomy
vaginal surgery
DDC-Sachgruppe: 610 Medizin, Gesundheit
Dokumenttyp: Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel
Abstract: The average lifespan has increased over time due to improvements in quality of life, leading to an aging population that stays healthy for longer. Pelvic organ prolapse (POP), whether uterine or vaginal, is a problem that severely impairs quality of life and imposes significant restrictions. The present study provides the reader with a summary of the many surgical techniques used in POP surgery, comparing international guidelines, offering an algorithm that is simple to understand, and allows the reader to quickly choose the table that includes the best surgical therapy for each individual. Using relevant keywords, the writers searched the PubMed and Scopus databases for relevant publications from 2000 to April 2023. Studies with cases of oncologic disorders or prior hysterectomy performed for another reason were not included in the analysis. Ten distinct international guidelines are highlighted and examined in the present study. We used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II-S (AGREE II-S) method to assess their quality, and incorporated the results into the conclusion. Worldwide, anterior colporrhaphy is the preferred method of treating anterior compartment abnormalities, and mesh is virtually always used when recurrence occurs (which happens in about half of the cases). Worldwide, posterior colporrhaphy is commonly used to repair posterior compartment abnormalities. Only a few national guidelines (the Iranian guideline, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica [AOGS], and the German-speaking countries) permit the use of mesh or xenograft in cases of recurrence. There is agreement on the abdominal approach (sacrocolpopexy) with mesh for treating apical deformities. Sacrospinous-hysteropexy is the standard method used to guide the vaginal approach; mesh is typically used to aid in this process. There are just three recommendations that do not include vaginal operations: HSE, AOGS, and Iran. Of obliteration techniques, colpocleisis is unquestionably the best. In conclusion, our analysis highlights the significance of customized methods in POP surgery, taking into account the requirements and preferences of each patient. To choose the best surgical therapy, criteria and patient features must be carefully considered.
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: 10.1002/ijgo.15614
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.15614
Link zu diesem Datensatz: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-439010
hdl:20.500.11880/39284
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-43901
ISSN: 1879-3479
0020-7292
Datum des Eintrags: 7-Jan-2025
Fakultät: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Fachrichtung: M - Frauenheilkunde
Professur: M - Keiner Professur zugeordnet
Sammlung:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes



Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons