Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen: doi:10.22028/D291-40820
Titel: Best research practices for using the Implicit Association Test
VerfasserIn: Greenwald, Anthony G.
Brendl, Miguel
Cai, Huajian
Cvencek, Dario
Dovidio, John F.
Friese, Malte
Hahn, Adam
Hehman, Eric
Hofmann, Wilhelm
Hughes, Sean
Hussey, Ian
Jordan, Christian
Kirby, Teri A.
Lai, Calvin K.
Lang, Jonas W. B.
Lindgren, Kristen P.
Maison, Dominika
Ostafin, Brian D.
Rae, James R.
Ratliff, Kate A.
Spruyt, Adriaan
Wiers, Reinout W.
Sprache: Englisch
Titel: Behavior research methods : BRM
Bandnummer: 54
Heft: 3
Seiten: 1161-1180
Verlag/Plattform: Springer Nature
Erscheinungsjahr: 2022
Freie Schlagwörter: implicit Association Test
recommended research practices
indirect attitude measurement
implicit social cognition
DDC-Sachgruppe: 150 Psychologie
Dokumenttyp: Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel
Abstract: Interest in unintended discrimination that can result from implicit attitudes and stereotypes (implicit biases) has stimulated many research investigations. Much of this research has used the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to measure association strengths that are presumed to underlie implicit biases. It had been more than a decade since the last published treatment of recommended best practices for research using IAT measures. After an initial draft by the first author, and continuing through three subsequent drafts, the 22 authors and 14 commenters contributed extensively to refining the selection and description of recommendation-worthy research practices. Individual judgments of agreement or disagreement were provided by 29 of the 36 authors and commenters. Of the 21 recommended practices for conducting research with IAT measures presented in this article, all but two were endorsed by 90% or more of those who felt knowledgeable enough to express agreement or disagreement; only 4% of the totality of judgments expressed disagreement. For two practices that were retained despite more than two judgments of disagreement (four for one, five for the other), the bases for those disagreements are described in presenting the recommendations. The article additionally provides recommendations for how to report procedures of IAT measures in empirical articles.
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: 10.3758/s13428-021-01624-3
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-021-01624-3
Link zu diesem Datensatz: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-408203
hdl:20.500.11880/36679
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-40820
ISSN: 1554-3528
1554-351X
Datum des Eintrags: 24-Okt-2023
Fakultät: HW - Fakultät für Empirische Humanwissenschaften und Wirtschaftswissenschaft
Fachrichtung: HW - Psychologie
Professur: HW - Prof. Dr. Malte Friese
Sammlung:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
s13428-021-01624-3.pdf510,09 kBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons