Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen: doi:10.22028/D291-40694
Volltext verfügbar? / Dokumentlieferung
Titel: Comparison of Metal Artifact Reduction in Dual- and Single-Source CT: A Vertebral Phantom Study
VerfasserIn: Jagoda, Philippe
Schmitz, Daniel
Wagenpfeil, Stefan
Bücker, Arno
Minko, Peter
Sprache: Englisch
Titel: AJR. American journal of roentgenology
Bandnummer: 211
Heft: 6
Seiten: 1298-1305
Verlag/Plattform: American Journal of Roentgenology
Erscheinungsjahr: 2018
Freie Schlagwörter: dual-energy CT
metal artifacts
virtual monoenergetic reconstruction
DDC-Sachgruppe: 610 Medizin, Gesundheit
Dokumenttyp: Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel
Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the capability of two algorithms for metal artifact reduction and virtual monoenergetic imaging (VME), a metal artifact reduction application for dual-source CT. Materials and methods: A bovine vertebra phantom with 16 artificial osteolyses and two 20 × 4.5 mm stainless steel screws was scanned on two single-source CT scanner and one dual-source CT scanner at a dose identical to the single-source acquisitions. Datasets were reconstructed with a metal artifact reduction algorithm for orthopedic implants (O-MAR, Philips Healthcare), an iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm (iMAR, Siemens Healthineers), and VME. Blinded to the method used for artifact reduction, three independent observers evaluated datasets regarding the extent of metal artifacts using a 4-point scale. Depicted osteolyses were counted and screw diameters measured for each reconstruction. Interobserver variability was evaluated using the Kendall coefficient of concordance for ordinal variables and the intraclass correlation coefficient for continuous data. Results: VME showed the best metal artifact reduction capability among evaluated methods; overall artifacts were rated 1.08 ± 0.29 for VME, 3.33 ± 0.65 for iMAR, and 3.91 ± 0.29 for O-MAR (p < 0.01). VME resulted in better representation of the cortical bone, trabecular structure, and soft tissue compared with the other two algorithms. VME provided the most realistic reconstruction of screw diameter. However, VME missed osteolyses. Good to almost perfect agreement was achieved for nearly all evaluated attributes. Conclusion: In our vertebral phantom, VME led to the most detailed representation of the osteosynthesis screw, caused the lowest amount of artifact, and represented the adjacent tissue best. Thus, VME should be considered as an alternative method to evaluate implants when other algorithms fail.
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: 10.2214/AJR.17.19397
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: https://www.ajronline.org/doi/epdf/10.2214/AJR.17.19397
Link zu diesem Datensatz: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-406941
hdl:20.500.11880/36580
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-40694
ISSN: 0361-803X
1546-3141
Datum des Eintrags: 9-Okt-2023
Fakultät: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Fachrichtung: M - Medizinische Biometrie, Epidemiologie und medizinische Informatik
Professur: M - Prof. Dr. Stefan Wagenpfeil
Sammlung:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Es gibt keine Dateien zu dieser Ressource.


Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.