Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen:
Volltext verfügbar? / Dokumentlieferung
doi:10.22028/D291-38595
Titel: | International prognostic indices in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma : a comparison of IPI, R-IPI, and NCCN-IPI |
VerfasserIn: | Ruppert, Amy S. Dixon, Jesse G. Salles, Gilles Wall, Anna Cunningham, David Poeschel, Viola Haioun, Corinne Tilly, Herve Ghesquieres, Herve Ziepert, Marita Flament, Jocelyne Flowers, Christopher Shi, Qian Schmitz, Norbert |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Titel: | Blood |
Bandnummer: | 135 |
Heft: | 23 |
Seiten: | 2041-2048 |
Verlag/Plattform: | ASH Publications |
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2020 |
DDC-Sachgruppe: | 610 Medizin, Gesundheit |
Dokumenttyp: | Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel |
Abstract: | Great heterogeneity in survival exists for patients newly diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Three scoring systems incorporating simple clinical parameters (age, lactate dehydrogenase, number/sites of involvement, stage, performance status) are widely used: the International Prognostic Index (IPI), revised IPI (R-IPI), and National Comprehensive Cancer Network IPI (NCCN-IPI). We evaluated 2124 DLBCL patients treated from 1998 to 2009 with frontline rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP; or variant) across 7 multicenter randomized clinical trials to determine which scoring system best discriminates overall survival (OS). Median age was 63 years, and 56% of patients were male. Five-year OS estimates ranged from 54% to 88%, from 61% to 93%, and from 49% to 92% using the IPI, R-IPI, and NCCN-IPI, respectively. The NCCN-IPI had the greatest absolute difference in OS estimates between the highest- and lowest-risk groups and best discriminated OS (concordance index 5 0.632 vs 0.626 [IPI] vs 0.590 [R-IPI]). For each given IPI risk category, NCCN-IPI risk categories were significantly associated with OS (P £ .01); the reverse was not true, and the IPI did not provide additional significant prognostic information within all NCCN-IPI risk categories. Collectively, the NCCN-IPI outperformed the IPI and R-IPI. Patients with low-risk NCCN-IPI had favorable survival outcomes with little room for further improvement. In the rituximab era, none of the clinical risk scores identified a patient subgroup with long-term survival clearly <50%. Integrating molecular features of the tumor and microenvironment into the NCCN-IPI or IPI might better characterize a high-risk group for which novel treatment approaches are most needed. (Blood. 2020;135(23):2041-2048) |
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: | 10.1182/blood.2019002729 |
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood.2019002729 |
Link zu diesem Datensatz: | urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-385953 hdl:20.500.11880/34777 http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-38595 |
ISSN: | 1528-0020 0006-4971 |
Datum des Eintrags: | 16-Dez-2022 |
Bezeichnung des in Beziehung stehenden Objekts: | Supplemental data |
In Beziehung stehendes Objekt: | https://ash.silverchair-cdn.com/ash/content_public/journal/blood/135/23/10.1182_blood.2019002729/2/bloodbld2019002729-suppl1.pdf?Expires=1672933276&Signature=CTPyUcr1oeyA5he~q6gl8Wqyki1bl3EfO~BoSG81DNdN8dFmWy5mc161Soj~ILMHnFF9JWbaaV5-NYEEY-WBx1niKnJYqcj6my~Epi2nMnI2RLeGH42WCZvC~ciw1JXbGwPU81lxxkiZFnZAyxb9qt9AGk6RT8MbPZkLaoc8OBt4fiOOJoKl~sYh3fBgP-ZKE47H9e6Ix0GLsMZfcxzjIFpzPkULlmjgkPCRwsAcWQbXcLKvyGBaJO9woAQRIDjZg6-GT1wYaje6dunjjt1omGPeWOoJrbLH83YRTyaAyqy9wv2zdhmCLlIwm~tpY5tjNcx0PdiSTkpOzAzHEDRGAA__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA |
Fakultät: | M - Medizinische Fakultät |
Fachrichtung: | M - Innere Medizin |
Professur: | M - Keiner Professur zugeordnet |
Sammlung: | SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes |
Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Es gibt keine Dateien zu dieser Ressource.
Alle Ressourcen in diesem Repository sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.