Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:Volltext verfügbar? / Dokumentlieferung
|Title:||An updated survey of beliefs and practices related to faking in individual assessments|
Risavy, Stephen D.
Jacobs, Rick R.
Christiansen, Neil D.
König, Cornelius J.
Speer, Andrew B.
|Title:||International Journal of Selection and Assessment|
|Year of Publication:||2021|
|Free key words:||faking|
|DDC notations:||150 Psychology|
|Publikation type:||Journal Article|
|Abstract:||The present study is an updated survey examining individual assessor beliefs and practices related to faking in the individual assessment context. The responses from a mix of quantitative and qualitative survey questions were compared across individual assessors from the original 2005 sample (n = 77) and an updated 2020 sample (n = 78). Results suggest that single stimulus personality assessments are still the predominant form of personality assessment in use, but many individual assessors employ other types of personality assessments such as forced-choice. In 2020, individual assessors do not appear to be heavily concerned about the effects of faking on their recommendations, do not believe that a large number of candidates fake, and believe that even fewer candidates successfully fake.|
|DOI of the first publication:||10.1111/ijsa.12335|
|URL of the first publication:||https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.12335|
|Link to this record:||urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-375169|
|Date of registration:||7-Oct-2022|
|Description of the related object:||Supporting Information|
|Faculty:||HW - Fakultät für Empirische Humanwissenschaften und Wirtschaftswissenschaft|
|Department:||HW - Psychologie|
|Professorship:||HW - Prof. Dr. Cornelius König|
|Collections:||SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes|
Files for this record:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in SciDok are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.