Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen:
doi:10.22028/D291-36282
Titel: | SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Rate and SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Health Care Workers in Aerosol-Generating Medical Disciplines |
VerfasserIn: | Muzalyova, Anna Ebigbo, Alanna Kahn, Maria Zellmer, Stephan Beyer, Albert Rosendahl, Jonas Zenk, Johannes Al-Nawas, Bilal Frankenberger, Roland Hoffmann, Juergen Arens, Christoph Lammert, Frank Traidl-Hoffmann, Claudia Messmann, Helmut Roemmele, Christoph |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Titel: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Bandnummer: | 11 |
Heft: | 10 |
Verlag/Plattform: | MDPI |
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2022 |
Freie Schlagwörter: | aerosol-generating procedures SARS-CoV-2 perceived risk of infection vaccination rate |
DDC-Sachgruppe: | 610 Medizin, Gesundheit |
Dokumenttyp: | Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel |
Abstract: | Healthcare workers (HCW) who perform aerosol-generating procedures (AGP) are at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data on infection rates and vaccination are limited. A nationwide, cross-sectional study focusing on AGP-related specialties was conducted between 3 May 2021 and 14 June 2021. Vaccination rates among HCW, perception of infection risk, and infection rates were analyzed, focusing on the comparison of gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) and other AGP-related specialties (NON-GIE), from the beginning of the pandemic until the time point of the study. Infections rates among HCW developed similarly to the general population during the course of the pandemic, however, with significantly higher infections rates among the GIE specialty. The perceived risk of infection was distributed similarly among HCW in GIE and NON-GIE (91.7%, CI: 88.6–94.4 vs. 85.8%, CI: 82.4–89.0; p < 0.01) with strongest perceived threats posed by AGPs (90.8%) and close patient contact (70.1%). The very high vaccination rate (100–80%) among physicians was reported at 83.5%, being significantly more frequently reported than among nurses (56.4%, p < 0.01). GIE had more often stated very high vaccination rate compared with NON-GIE (76.1% vs. 65.3%, p < 0.01). A significantly higher rate of GIE was reported to have fewer concerns regarding infection risk after vaccination than NON-GIE (92.0% vs. 80.3%, p < 0.01). |
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: | 10.3390/jcm11102751 |
Link zu diesem Datensatz: | urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-362822 hdl:20.500.11880/32964 http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-36282 |
ISSN: | 2077-0383 |
Datum des Eintrags: | 30-Mai-2022 |
Bezeichnung des in Beziehung stehenden Objekts: | Supplementary Materials |
In Beziehung stehendes Objekt: | https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm11102751/s1 |
Fakultät: | M - Medizinische Fakultät |
Fachrichtung: | M - Innere Medizin |
Professur: | M - Prof. Dr. Frank Lammert |
Sammlung: | SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes |
Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
jcm-11-02751.pdf | 1,5 MB | Adobe PDF | Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons