Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen: doi:10.22028/D291-35470
Titel: Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Re-Induction following Resistance or Toxicity
VerfasserIn: Koch, Elias A. T.
Petzold, Anne
Wessely, Anja
Dippel, Edgar
Gesierich, Anja
Gutzmer, Ralf
Hassel, Jessica C.
Haferkamp, Sebastian
Kähler, Katharina C.
Knorr, Harald
Kreuzberg, Nicole
Leiter, Ulrike
Loquai, Carmen
Meier, Friedegund
Meissner, Markus
Mohr, Peter
Pföhler, Claudia
Rahimi, Farnaz
Schadendorf, Dirk
Schell, Beatrice
Schlaak, Max
Terheyden, Patrick
Thoms, Kai-Martin
Schuler-Thurner, Beatrice
Ugurel, Selma
Ulrich, Jens
Utikal, Jochen
Weichenthal, Michael
Ziller, Fabian
Berking, Carola
Heppt, Markus V.
Sprache: Englisch
Titel: Cancers
Bandnummer: 14
Heft: 3
Verlag/Plattform: MDPI
Erscheinungsjahr: 2022
Freie Schlagwörter: uveal melanoma
immune checkpoint blockade
PD-1
CTLA-4
re-induction
treatment resistance
toxicity
DDC-Sachgruppe: 610 Medizin, Gesundheit
Dokumenttyp: Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel
Abstract: Re-induction with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) needs to be considered in many patients with uveal melanoma (UM) due to limited systemic treatment options. Here, we provide hitherto the first analysis of ICB re-induction in UM. A total of 177 patients with metastatic UM treated with ICB were included from German skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg). To investigate the impact of ICB re-induction, two cohorts were compared: patients who received at least one ICB re-induction (cohort A, n = 52) versus those who received only one treatment line of ICB (cohort B, n = 125). In cohort A, a transient benefit of overall survival (OS) was observed at 6 and 12 months after the treatment start of ICB. There was no significant difference in OS between both groups (p = 0.1) with a median OS of 16.2 months (cohort A, 95% CI: 11.1–23.8) versus 9.4 months (cohort B, 95% CI: 6.1–14.9). Patients receiving re-induction of ICB (cohort A) had similar response rates compared to those receiving ICB once. Re-induction of ICB may yield a clinical benefit for a small subgroup of patients even after resistance or development of toxicities.
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: 10.3390/cancers14030518
Link zu diesem Datensatz: urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-354700
hdl:20.500.11880/32402
http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-35470
ISSN: 2072-6694
Datum des Eintrags: 17-Feb-2022
Fakultät: M - Medizinische Fakultät
Fachrichtung: M - Dermatologie
Professur: M - Keiner Professur zugeordnet
Sammlung:SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes

Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Datei Beschreibung GrößeFormat 
cancers-14-00518-v2.pdf712,15 kBAdobe PDFÖffnen/Anzeigen


Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons Creative Commons