Bitte benutzen Sie diese Referenz, um auf diese Ressource zu verweisen:
doi:10.22028/D291-35371
Titel: | Comparison of isoflurane and propofol sedation in critically ill COVID-19 patients-a retrospective chart review |
VerfasserIn: | Kermad, Azzeddine Speltz, Kermad Danziger, Guy Mertke, Thilo Bals, Robert Volk, Thomas Lepper, Philipp M. Meiser, Andreas |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Titel: | Journal of Anesthesia |
Bandnummer: | 35 |
Heft: | 5 |
Seiten: | 625–632 |
Verlag/Plattform: | Springer Nature |
Erscheinungsjahr: | 2021 |
Freie Schlagwörter: | COVID-19 Inhaled sedation Isofurane AnaConDa ECMO Critical care |
DDC-Sachgruppe: | 610 Medizin, Gesundheit |
Dokumenttyp: | Journalartikel / Zeitschriftenartikel |
Abstract: | Purpose In this retrospective study, we compared inhaled sedation with isoflurane to intravenous propofol in invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients with ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome). Methods Charts of all 20 patients with COVID-19 ARDS admitted to the ICU of a German University Hospital during the first wave of the pandemic between 22/03/2020 and 21/04/2020 were reviewed. Among screened 333 days, isoflurane was used in 97 days, while in 187 days, propofol was used for 12 h or more. The effect and dose of these two sedatives were compared. Mixed sedation days were excluded. Results Patients’ age (median [interquartile range]) was 64 (60–68) years. They were invasively ventilated for 36 [21–50] days. End-tidal isoflurane concentrations were high (0.96 ± 0.41 Vol %); multiple linear regression yielded the ratio (isoflurane infusion rate)/(minute ventilation) as the single best predictor. Infusion rates were decreased under ECMO (3.5 ± 1.4 versus 7.1 ± 3.2 ml∙h−1; p < 0.001). In five patients, the maximum recommended dose of propofol of 4 mg∙hour−1∙kg−1ABW was exceeded on several days. On isoflurane compared to propofol days, neuro-muscular blocking agents (NMBAs) were used less frequently (11% versus 21%; p < 0.05), as were co-sedatives (7% versus 31%, p < 0.001); daily opioid doses were lower (720 [720–960] versus 1080 [720–1620] mg morphine equivalents, p < 0.001); and RASS scores indicated deeper levels of sedation (− 4.0 [− 4.0 to − 3.0] versus − 3.0 [− 3.6 to − 2.5]; p < 0.01). Conclusion Isoflurane provided sufficient sedation with less NMBAs, less polypharmacy and lower opioid doses compared to propofol. High doses of both drugs were needed in severely ill COVID-19 patients. |
DOI der Erstveröffentlichung: | 10.1007/s00540-021-02960-6 |
Link zu diesem Datensatz: | urn:nbn:de:bsz:291--ds-353716 hdl:20.500.11880/32279 http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-35371 |
ISSN: | 1438-8359 0913-8668 |
Datum des Eintrags: | 2-Feb-2022 |
Fakultät: | M - Medizinische Fakultät |
Fachrichtung: | M - Anästhesiologie M - Innere Medizin |
Professur: | M - Prof. Dr. Robert Bals M - Prof. Dr. Thomas Volk |
Sammlung: | SciDok - Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes |
Dateien zu diesem Datensatz:
Datei | Beschreibung | Größe | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kermad2021_Article_ComparisonOfIsofluraneAndPropo.pdf | 1,91 MB | Adobe PDF | Öffnen/Anzeigen |
Diese Ressource wurde unter folgender Copyright-Bestimmung veröffentlicht: Lizenz von Creative Commons